>>73 good morning I hate women

>>499 how is it so hard to prove to you people that concurrence doesn't prove causality? jordan peterson (iota) thinks that it's *birth control* affecting women's hormones. by that logic, women who are on birth control already think they're pregnant. therefore you hav a bunch of self-satisfied women who have no biological need for you. i submit that this is not the case, obviously. not only are we not controlled by our hormones but are rather controlled by social factors. there's an experiement that proves this. the control group of mice have regular water and heroin water alone in their cages. they drink the heroin water until they die. same heroin water and regular water for the other group of mice. the mice try the heroin water and leave it alone because they are more fulfilled by social interaction. the real lift example would be the heroin use during the vietnam war, when the veterans didn't come back as heroin addicts. ok, are you with me so far? then you would suggest that the social factor here (i have no idea why you think that it's more likely women in the workforce rather than whatever that other graph was representing, women's liberation generally? how do you measure that? some UN matrix?((i didn't take that class in college i'm not doing statystical analysis because whoever thinks this can't get pusey)). what about, then, the change in birthrates as a function of industrialization? is that why it's more likely? seems to be the case. you don't need seven kids to till a farm so you don't have them. plus kids are expensive. is it an economic factor? you're pushing yourself away from the table if you're working middle class or lower and have more than two kids. so we have, as factors: religion, feminism, industrialization, economic shifts, to explain a declining birthrate amongst first world couples. let's include in feminism things like abortion because there's a matrix to measure feminism too. am i missing something? that you want to reduce it all to feminism?

>>73 >>98 >>99 >>157 >>160 kys you fucking retarded imbred troglodyte >>603 >>974

homie you wrong about the mice heaven heaven experiment it was cocaine and THEY FUCKING LOVED IT. partied like my dad

>>499 Well, no. Women's liberation has an effect on birth rates. But it is far more likely that it's more about atheism and secularism than women's liberation. Let's look at your table. Lets pick the country that has the lowest gender inequality score, Slovenia, the country with least births, Singapore. Slovenia: 73% Catholicism 21.5% Atheism 2.4% Islam 2.2% Eastern Orthodox

>>969 Mi PC don't run Minecraft :^)

fucking stupid nigger whore fuck you and your shitty rule cucked server i'll find you and kill your entire family

>>969 <no being toxic i bet you think killing people in a survival sandbox game is toxic

>>880 I don't know, I don't really know the community of this place, but if that can reassure you I'm not a normie and I hate normies

No, but you better hope normalfags don't discover this website on accident, or it will be the death of this place. just like 4ch*n's /r9k/

>>880 normalfags are anywhere, including here.

>>880 There is no anyone here really...

>>880 You can deter normalfags by making high quality posts that are too long for them. I suggest developing a posting schedule where you post a new essay every week after you have read enough books to have an in depth conversation.

GOOD. Fuck the normalfags. If they aren't going to treat me like I'm an equal because I am poor, because I don't have great social skills and because I like to spend time alone and because I am not totally fit then GOOD.

The only way to beat them is to become a gay rapist yourself

>>883 That pic is super hot. Source?

And that's a good thing™

>>922 Use reverse image search next time fag

>>818 lmao seethe

>>788 fuck ponyfags

oh forgot...

you know random kikes are gonna spam your thread with bothersome melancholy anyway so why bother

>>870 go back to plebbitchan fatty >>874 >DA JOOS

Super Dee Duper!

He really is unstoppable

lee wannabe that's the funny part. lee has been doing this for 8 year straight and doesn't seem like he's going to stop anytime soon. not even global rule 15 being removed would stop him

>>765 It's called National Socialism.

>>778 >Nazis being better than Commies no

If you want free speech, then you need to control the medium. Set up your own chan / irc / murmur / forum servers. Attacks on speech are generalized so defenses of it must be as well. Ignore anyone that suggests anything to the opposite, as they are helping your enemies. 4chan stopped by a chan site many years ago when they were purchased and moot / max stepped out. It just has the same few hundred MB of regurgitated trendy crap. Start your own and make it your own, with your own style.

>>786 >those two things being anything alike kek! If anything Liberals (includes conservatives) are more like commies as they both think everyone is equal.

THIS. I'm tired of it too. At this point, the only place where free speech is protected is when you are conversing with like minded people in real life. Everything you say on the internet is timestamped and recorded.