https://support.bitchute.com/announcements/response-to-hope-not-hate-report-on-bitchute https://archive.fo/2fSRQ

BitChute bans the Nordic Resistance Movement CENSORSHIP. The “free speech” video website BitChute has banned the Nordic Resistance Movement’s account and a large number of other Resistance Movement videos. BitChute has banned the Nordic Resistance Movement’s official channel, the NRM radio channel and has deleted a large number of videos uploaded by other users featuring the Resistance Movement in what appears to be a mass wave of censorship. The “free speech” video site replaced the Nordic Resistance Movement’s account with the following message on Thursday: >Your channel has been blocked for breaching the BitChute Community Guidelines. >An email was sent to your registered email address detailing the reasoning behind this decision. >If you have not received it, or wish to appeal against the decision, then please contact us. However, despite this claim, no emails have been received to our registered email address from BitChute. In addition, no warnings or notifications about our videos were received by the Resistance Movement from BitChute prior to the ban. This is not the first instance of BitChute censoring legitimate content on its site. Recently, BitChute blocked a number of popular channels in various countries, forcing users to use a VPN in order to view them. The censorship followed BitChute’s statement in July in which they “encouraged organizations like Hope Not Hate” (a UK-based “anti-racist” organisation) to “help them improve their processes”. To continue following our video content, please subscribe to us on Odysee: Nordic Resistance Movement You can also find our radio channels on Odysee: https://odysee.com/@LeadershipPerspective:0 https://odysee.com/@nordicfrontier:3 https://odysee.com/@Aristogenesis:2 https://nordicresistancemovement.org/bitchute-bans-the-nordic-resistance-movement/ https://archive.fo/9fMSl

>>37619 A couple weeks ago, the lads were shitting on Bitshit for working with Hope not Hate, and announced they were moving to Odysee, so its not surprising they were one of the first to be removed or how it went down About 16min in to ep. with Cultured_Thug it comes up https://odysee.com/@nordicfrontier:3/nordic_frontier_166_cultured_thug_and_the_3rd_position:7

>>37619 Shit. I was getting white pilled about Bitchute.

>>37617 why did anyone think that buttshoot was a good alternative? Did they not realize it was based in the UK?

>>37650 Well mostly because he expressly marketed himself as being the 'muh freezepeach' jewtube censorship solution. The internet is worldwide, so generally if someone wants to say fuck you to a countries censorship it is not that hard to move your data to another country. Besides this seems more like cucking on a personal level than anything else. Its still too early to say for sure, there is a lot content on bitshit that seems more radical than nordicfrontier so perhaps its just new moderation growing pains. The fact that no reason or reply was given may back that point up. On the other hand even entering into discussions with Hope not Hate is supreme cucking. They are basically the UK version of SPLC or ADL and don't give two shits about extremism unless it's the straight White male flavour.

>>37652 But the owner and the servers are in the UK, and last time I checked, if he was earnest in running a platform that was based on free speech, he wouldn't be in the UK to begin with.

>>37672 Meh, I wouldn't go that far, not everyone is able/willing to move to Mongolia or a Philippine pig farm for their ideals. But your right about being able to set up servers in a more friendly country. Personally I suspect it mostly comes down to his bank account being in the UK and he is simply selling out now. Will wait to see what other channels get/don't get shoah'd before passing final judgement

>>37617 Worldtruthvideos.org

Bitshit responds (sort of) https://twitter.com/bitchute/status/1337719700197756929 https://archive.fo/BvWN7 Dodges follow up questions

>>37685 > pirating movies What for? The pirates are already all on Usenet and private trackers. And those are decentralized, unlike this youtube clone.

Online harms bill: firms face up to £18m fine for illegal content UK government sets out strict guidelines to govern removal of material promoting child sexual abuse and terrorism Social media companies will need to remove and limit the spread of harmful content or face fines of up to £18m, the government has announced, as it finally reveals the details of its proposed internet regulation. The online harms bill, first proposed by Theresa May’s government in April 2019, sets out strict new guidelines governing removal of illegal content such as child sexual abuse, terrorist material and media that promotes suicide, which sites must obey or face being blocked in the UK. It also requires platforms to abide by a new code of conduct that sets out their responsibilities towards children. The bill requires the most popular sites to set their own terms and conditions, and face fines if they fail to stick to them. For the first time, online misinformation will come under the remit of a government regulator, in cases when content is legal but could cause significant physical or psychological harm to adults. Ofcom, which has been confirmed as the regulator by the bill, will have the power to levy unprecedented fines of up to £18m or 10% of global turnover. By contrast, GDPR laws cap fines at €20m (£18m) or 4% of global turnover. Ofcom will also have the power to block services from the UK entirely. The government has backed down on one suggestion, made in the initial consultation, to bring criminal sanctions against individual executives. The legislation includes provisions for such penalties, but that power will need to be separately introduced by parliament via secondary legislation. The government says it plans to introduce that legislation only if companies fail to take the new rules seriously. “Today Britain is setting the global standard for safety online with the most comprehensive approach yet to online regulation,” said the digital secretary, Oliver Dowden. More... https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/15/online-harms-bill-firms-face-up-to-18m-fine-for-content https://archive.fo/WKgPm

>>37701 >For the first time, online misinformation will come under the remit of a government regulator, in cases when content is legal but could cause significant physical or psychological harm to adults. There is the kicker, this bill has nothing to do with cheesy pizza

Lbry master race

>>37685 >we remove channels because of muh rules >totally not because of outside pressure I don't understand what the incentive is to censor anything unless in endangers/contributes to the endangerment of children. Gov wise wouldn't you want open communication for tracking porpoises, like the honeypot 4chan is? >>37701 >>37703 Above being said when people do things and claim it's for the children it's a lie. Gov doesn't care about children and people that fight for the gov never have and never will. The the only people that care about children are the family members of children.

>another instance of something from the uk being completely cucked and faggy beyond recognition Are people really surprised? Honestly fuck butshoot. Some of the shit on there is O.K to watch but for the most part its just another massive psy op perpetuated by zog. contrarian media= where all the 8 year old fags and bronies living in their moms basement are thinking they are getting the scoop of "what's really going on" but in reality its mostly garbage. Most media is subverted bullshit waiting to get jewed out anyway. Read books. Dont go to theaters, burn your Tv. And only come to the internet to expose these pedo antifa instigators for what they are. Expect nothing.

>>37723 >Read books I like the way you think.

>>37674 WTV runs like shit, has no sort options for search, and no way to easily d/l videos https://altcensored.com/ is better, though has much less uploaders

>>37813 Not to mention it leaks your IP address when you watch a video or leave a comment.

>>37721 https://bitwave.tv/ https://www.brighteon.com/ https://dlive.tv/ https://gvid.tv/ https://lbry.tv/ (((CEO))) https://lbry.com/team https://rumble.com/ https://vid8.poal.co/ ----- https://voat.co/v/technology/4047940 https://voat.co/v/politics/4155819

>>37918 Does this mean LBRY has backdoors in it to censor it? I thought it was Opensource, https://github.com/lbryio/lbrytv ? Maybe it is just Jews running the company because they fucking buy everything?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7J3B0raTNx1p/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/UrYPuwy1ANR1/ https://worldtruthvideos.org/@BookAnon

>>37918 >https://www.brighteon.com/ https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-10-29-brighteon-com-declares-video-platform-no-place-for-jew-haters.html >As the founder of Brighteon.com, I watched in horror this last weekend as a deranged lunatic murdered innocent Jewish congregation members on a Synagogue in Pittsburgh. Such acts of hatred against those of Jewish faith are evil beyond description. >As a matter of principle, I have posted a heartfelt video that denounces all Jew haters and “Nazi labelers” – people who wrongfully label others as “Nazis” just because they disagree with their political views. >You can find that video here and I encourage you to watch it: https://www.brighteon.com/5854551733001

The rest fell off my clipboard. Coincidentally the main point. >In that video, I explain that “Jew haters” are simply not welcomed on Brighteon.com. Reasoned criticism is free speech, but calling for the annihilation of people of Jewish faith is not acceptable and we will not allow Brighteon to be used for that purpose. >We honor free speech, but we are not a platform for speech that espouses violence against people based solely on their religious affiliation.

>>37951 >>37952 Actual free speech is only available on underground sites, P2P protocols, and so on. You'll never find any mainstream site on the modern web that allows it. So all these centralized youtube alternatives are a non-starter, even if they initially pretend to be pro free-speech (they'll just change their minds later on, or get pressured to until they cave in). Also beware of sites that require cuckflare. They can easily be made to comply or else get fucked like 8ch.

>>37727 Is that from a guc movie night?

>>37918 Peertube has always struck me as the best option

>>37979 Voat is officially dead. I hope whatever useful information that was on there was gotten off. Man it sucks that 8chan shitted itself, it was the best place for archiving shit.

>>37727 Thank you. and In b4 some fag "oh but ur using da inanet to post dat! her derr" Use sites like these to accomplish those goals and protect the last bastion of free speech or what ever the fuck is left of it.

If Americans don't mind if states close churches, ban websites, ban protests, arrest reporters, outlaw guns, seize property, wiretap phones, torture, and have kill lists, would Americans care if states legalize slavery?

>>38165 perhaps we should call you "chinq" ie. chink+"Q"

>>37619 Bitchute doesnt censor the channels in other countries, it is the ISP and it is the law, they are just complying with it, it has nothing to do with what they "want" to do as a company. Use a US web proxy to access whatever is blocked in that cucked country, it isnt hard to circumvent. I would like to see this email they say they sent you before slandering them. You dont seem to really know how things work so I wouldn't be surprised if you legitimately broke their terms of service. If you did legitimately break their terms of service then dont fucking smear them for what you did,

>>37951 4D chess negro https://www.brighteon.com/dashboard/videos/7ed4174c-1dbe-4d1b-ba89-2b3f685577ae

>>37951 oops wrong link https://www.brighteon.com/7ed4174c-1dbe-4d1b-ba89-2b3f685577ae

>>38165 Some Americans want small mommy gf with small milky, but we need to make sure the tent is big enough for the mommy gf with biggie milky. And penis.

>>37617 Unfortunately I don't have any favorite channel. I hate them all because they refuse to educate the truths of this world in an efficient enough manner.

>>37617 https://www.bitchute.com/channel/chemplayer/ If there's any chemistry interested anons here have a look at Chemplayer's channel.

Why it's so hard to unite against evil? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzkSInBIKvo

>>37685 so let me get this straight: If I was a corrupt politician/billionaire I can evade taxes, pass laws that fuck you and take your last rights away, steal an election, ban trump from social media, delete whole channels, make a dictatorship and assume complete control over the senate and supreme court. Hell, i could even pay your daughter to be kidnapped and raped by niggers if you get in my way. But if ANYONE DARED to make bitchute video telling people...not to make bombs or murder people....but to at least start cheating taxes, fuck with the government, disobey the laws, graffity, share posters, fuck up someones car, that is inciting violence and you get taken down? Gotcha fam. Tommorow I can have my thugs patrolling on every street taking people to the gulags and if you speak about rising up even by petty vandalism i will mark you as "inciting violence" and delete you. LMAO these cucks caring about pirating movies. bitchute is a cucked joke and will now die.

>>39199 Bless you

>skrewdriver - blood and honour (two different versions) >race war - hail blood and honour these hypocritical faggots have the gall to beg me for money after blocking 3 songs on my channel. fuck 'em.

>>37687 I just use a regular VPN and piratebay. I'm not paying Jews for content. Why would you bother with usenet anymore?

>>39547 >>>/the_cuckold/