>normies hate slimes more then kikes
Assuming it's true, then who's fault really?
>slimes supposedly did 9/11
Get outta here kike.
> Jews on the other hand are the little victim that needs to be helped
That's the lie they project.
>witch one would have redpilled normies
Tarrant didn't redpill normies you dunce.
>killing people or punishing people that most people hate will make you liked more
Only in your little head. At best some might have said serves them right and then moved on.
>Also it should be a crime and a heresy to question if Saint Tarrent is a hero and every future disciple saints and disciples for all of time!
Hello yid. A hero fights for truth. Tarrant didn't provide truth. The manifesto is part of a controlled opposition scheme.
>Perhaps he didn't want to be dismissed as just another crazy "anti-semitic"
Yeah instead he just got dismissed as another crazy white supremacist... who got called fascist and even nazi anyway.
>at least the media was forced to say he was anti-immigration
Not even close. Because when you are anti-immigration, you have to explain the cause to explain the problem and solve it.
The only thing people could remember from what oozed was that he was against Islam.
>He was accused of being a false flag to push for gun control
And that's exactly what Jews obtained, along many other obvious gains. Are you going to deny that, shill?
>had he gone after a synagogue the same schizos would claim he was just helping kikes by making them the eternal victims.
First of all, even if Jews have historically demonstrated a will to sacrifice a part of themselves to obtain more power for the greater Jewish, they are certainly not willing to have Jews be killed on a daily routine.
Second, yes, they need to be able to identify as the eternal victim and maintain the illusion.
Third, just as in mosques, Jews who populate some random synagogue are random ones. They are not important targets.
How come all of your "heroes" always make themselves known and always go for the low hanging fruit instead of silently killing one or two major targets at a time? Most traitors and Jews operate in plain daylight, aren't even living in massively protected areas, and are not even escorted by mercenaries or cops.
This is a rhetorical question because we know why all these shooters just fail to actually be efficient killers.
WHY EVEN USE GUNS?
When you could use knives or home made bombs which would be impossible to legally exploit for Jews?
How could they attack gun ownership and the 2A if you used anything lethal but no guns?
>I don’t understand why so many people find it odd that someone can visit Israel.
Many? You make shit up.
>Because they are shills with the goal to spread demoralization
Asking for truth and proper logic is not demoralization.
Pretending that killing random Muslims is the path to salvation without even once exposing the kikes and their closest allies is lying.
That is even more heinous than demoralization for it locks you in a situation where you will never really be free.
> ("No white man could ever be able to fight back, they're all Mossad jews!")
No, that's the retarded generalization and strawman arguments you kikes plant everywhere.
>and disinformation ("It was a CGI falseflag with dummies and crisis actors!").
That's the other blatant deception you use to control both sides of the narrative. It's like those who claim planes that hit on 9/11 didn't exist, were CGI.
It's either totally legit and honest as per the official story, or is completely tinfoil wacky stuff.
>If you search "Tarrant vacationed in Israel" on cuckchan's archive you will find hundreds of results, with dozens upon dozens of identical replies made by shills (and probably bots) that pop up as soon as a Tarrant thread appears in the catalog.
They've been doing this non-stop since March 15 2019.
You could say the same thing about the greater number of posts about Tarrant being a false flag agent or being /ourguy/. So an appeal to quantity proves nothing.
>Tarrant knew he would be locked up for life
1. no he didn't (he could die that day).
2. thinking this, there is no reason for him to lie by not exposing kikes.
> including Israel so he could presumably know his enemy or at the very least see what it's like there.
He never identified Israel as the enemy. He never explained why Israel even exists to begin with.
FUNNY HOW WHEN A "RIGHT WING" E-CELEB FAILS TO EXPOSE JEWS, THIS PERSON IS CALLED "CONTROLLED OPPOSITION"
BUT WHEN A RADICAL E-CELED GOES TO SHOOT PEOPLE WHILE NOT EXPOSING JEWS, THE GUY SUDDENLY BECOMES TOTALLY LEGIT