A step in the right direction, but still not there.
>when you have no appreciation of hierarchy of order?
You are purposefully misinterpreting what I write while underestimating the intelligence of other posters (a trait typical for kikes and soyim), try being less obvious. Luckily, others can read for themselves, without (((you))) being there to interpret it for them, oh wise Guru Rabbi
:>) I have utmost appreciation for hierarchy and order, but only those substantiated with truth, not false gods and their slovenly slaves. There can be many, entirely unique instances of the "King Of The Universe" , but any proclaiming himself as the only god is a false god and the ultimate deceiver. I have already proven your "one god" to be a logical contradiction. My hierarchy and order are truer than yours, simple as.
>Troy Southgate's book Tradition And Revolution about National-Anarchism.
I'll look it up, thanks.
>There is and should be a Ruler.
Of course, however, the real hierarchy is not a pyramid at least not at the top
. It's not a closed-circuit system, it's not linear. Masonic cucks You are one even if you think that you are against them as long as you share the same underlying philosophy
cannot into advanced mathematics, zero/infinity and stochastic processes. And as Nietzsche said, even if there is such a God, why shouldn't I strive to be that God? And no, you can't become a god without being surrounded with proper people, those people having to be of the proper race and possess proper qualities. Even in your 'holy books' your god speaks in plural (us, we), should have taken a hint
I have no problem with rulers, but they need to justify their right to rule aristocratically, not rely on Jewish memeplexes and pilpul their way into power.
>Order Of Nine Angles
Freudian slip? :>) But no, I have no idea who those people are. Being European, I am a man of high culture, things coming from the US can hardly influence me. Who am I kidding, I'm turning into one of them more and more ;_;
A switch of tactics, eh? Since you (your team) saw that you have zero counter-arguments, you are now trying to display mine as "too basic" , without offering anything "more advanced" . And no, the 100% kosher certified material written for bored housewifes that your friend keeps spamming all over the internets wherever some bad goy might have bad goy ideas, is not advanced. That explanation was a summary of what I'm "shilling" since it's precisely that which was requested. But now I see that you actually agree with me :>) Well, Sieg Heil to that!
>What about you swallow up that misplaced pride and lurk ten years more, faggit?
Message too long. Click
to view full text.