>To start with your OP, aside from being a shit slide thread, got moved because no one is interested in cross board posting.
- Fair enough
>Are we really expected to go find your (now deleted) cryptic posts on end then come back here to respond?
- I re-posted the entire conversation here, it;s all here, and my posts are not cryptic at all, it's that my ideology is different from those I'm being compared to in key ways, then I listed off some of those ways, and I went full disclosure on how my ideology was come up with independent of books, television, personalities, groups, etc. I just thought my whole position up by myself around high school (typically while in the shower, where I do my best thinking), and 4/pool/ was the one who pointed out my similarities.
>Do you think we give a shit to read your half a conservation now?
- again I posted both halves of the conversation.
>Take your blog post to r/liberal or r/libertarian
-Yeah, fuck those guys, remember when I said tat my ideas are different from theirs? well those differences mean they don't like me very much.
I'm against globalism and in favor of strict immigration control, either making immigration "white gentiles only", or ending immigration altogether, I also came up with the concept of "reciprocal immigration" tat would even things out in the favor of whites wile showing up the "open borders" advocate's true colors, but they rejected tat as well ("muh imperialism", well, if it's imperialism when WE do it.... BANNED).
I got a similar reaction to my position against foreign labor and foreign goods, I proposed to either use tariffs to disincentivise their usage, or to just cut them off altogether (possibly with the sole exception where no domestic alternative exists, and even then only until an domestic alternative is discovered) (I got a BAN for that.) .
I believe that taxation isn't theft, but could be sen as paying for the objective and impartial protective services of of the government, I got a surprisingly strong push back on that too (and another BAN).
I believe in ethnonationalism because my "self-interest" is defined by loyalty to one's genetics, not something that ends at oneself, but extends to every living being by way of degrees of genetic similarity. They called me a Nazi for that.
I believe in racial differences and in particular those of the jews, who are a groups that operates as a parasitic organism, towards all other groups. I even pointed out the evolutionary explanations behind both. Again, I'm B& again for being a "Nazi".
The liberals hate absolutely everything about me and I hate everything about them, so I have no idea why you;'d compare mew to them so damn much, they B& me ten times harder than the libertarians ever did.
>As you pointed out aside from being a bad idea
-how is MY political position a "bad idea"? It protects white demographics, it protects the national interest, it kicks out the subversive Jewish parasites, it restores racial self-determination, revives the economy, amputates any unnecessary part of the system prone to being infected by corruption (while at the same time removing the magnet of "gibs" and fostering a culture where people are willing to help each other), and ensures no one else can fuck with us by builing up a military and going full total annihilation on anyone who attacks us.
>Libertarianism is born of and promoted by Jews
Not mine, I came up with it on my own, it;s very different, and you refuse to address those differences, think of my positions as a completely different animal to be handled on it's own terms, not the terms of others.
If your opposition is to the things my ideology shares in common with theirs, go ahead, we can actually make some conversation about that, but right now you are attacking me for policies I never supported, books I never read, people I've never listened to, groups I've never associated with, and just generally for things I've never said.
Finally, which Jews would support MY ideas today? The Jews who created libertarianism certainly wouldn't, and the Jews of today would oppose my opinions even more strongly and harshly - I'm a "Nazi", remember?
Lastly, libertarianism being borne of the Jews you cite is difficult for me to agree with because I see it as one of the first forms of government that would emerge in any people moving towards civilization, in fact, I'd say the existence of libertarian-type societies predate the very existence of Jews as a people (when they first began living in foreign lands, like Sumeria and Egypt, Greece and Rome, etc.).
>I'm starting and pinning this as the successor to the old "redpills and webms", but as you might know, The Matrix was made by the Ghost in the Shell ripping off tranny Wachowski kikes so the term "red pill" is cringe-worthy.
- yeah, I agree that's why I never used the term "red pill" and refuse to do so to this day.
(are you implying that I've used it in the past? where?)