AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>>9844 >Because it dosen't express anything. >it's solely there for people to masturbate to You're contradicting yourself there. The expression of porn is sexual arousal. It is media explicitly designed to cause sexual arousal... and that is a form of expression. ...maybe not an especially high form of expression... but a form of expression nonetheless.

>>9845 >The expression of porn is sexual arousal. Giving people boners isn't expression. Is prostitution art? Are camwhores artists?

>>9846 Yes, it is a form of expression. Sexual excitation is an emotion, creating something designed to illicit that emotion is a form of expression. Just as you write a book or make a movie or paint a piece of art to try and illicit emotional responses... the exact same thing is done using porn. Arousal is an emotion. It's no different than hate, fear, excitement, intrigue, wonder, bewilderment, confusion, love, lust, disgust, etc, etc, etc. Emotional expression is expression... again, not necessarily the highest form of expression, but... no, no I think, in humans... it actually might be ~the~ highest form of expression. It's like the old adage, "sex sells"... it's the reason why sexualized content is used prolifically in advertisements... because sexualization ~is~ the highest form of expression in humans. Because humans are sexual beings, much of our inherent, baseline nature is deeply rooted in sexualization in such a way that nothing, literally NOTHING attracts our attention more than sex. So no, you are completely and totally wrong to the point of actually being in direct contradiction to your own human nature. ...maybe you've got a medical problem dude. Do your balls not work? You should probably go see a doctor.

here and it's better http://fljwgmxzjuvoqp5c4wncmlfcy3gpkrglsythlljch2djkh6y7kigvxad.onion

test https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A4-SVUHQYI

>>8087 How do you feel about VHS, though?

>>8088 I'm pretty sure you have to have been born after 2010 to think that VHS is a boomer thing. Where exactly are your parents? Do you need the number for child protective services? Because, seriously, I'll give it to ya.

>>8089 DONT EVER FUCKING DISRESPECT VHS AGAIN > : (

Time to butt bump the homo thread!

>>8142 Still not getting, are you, Fumbles?

>>8143 Uhm, hey "Fumbles", the term is "Stumbles".

>>8155 The term is "Cumbles"

>>8143 Getting what drumbles? Have you already given me a pet name? I'm not gay bro I got a wife and twenty children and a ranch so... yeah

>>4542 to be fair tho if you decide to live in a place like michigan then whatever happens to you is fair game

>>9727 It's probably not going to last though. Usually any site I actively post material on for about a year or two will jump into the 10k range on Alexa... at which point it just becomes like a conveyor belt of bullshit speeding along the ass end of the Internet at mach 7. Sometimes that can be mitigated a bit with the creation of more sub boards though (what 8Chan does). ...that's usually the point at which I move on to smaller boards though. I like stuff that's niche, lesser known. I find a certain sense of enjoyment in obscurity. I can remember posting on just about every board at one time or another, from 2Channel, to 4Chan, to 7Chan, to 8Chan, to 420Chan, to AnonIB, to 888Chan, etc, etc.

>>9545 >4chan -> 8ch >8ch is kill >was 4chan always this bad? >8ch = 4chan x 2 >what is 8ch x 2 There you go

>>9545 >edgy teen, on mooncentral >heard 4chan is shit >8chan better >didn't bother with 4chan >checked out 8chan >spent little time there, looked for some news here and then >Heard about New Zealand shooting and 8chan on the news >Need to check out 8chan >Heard about several other IBs, namely MLPOL and 16chan >8chan kill >goto horsefucker IB >good times >not fast enough, decide to use MLPOL and 16chan in parallel is /pnd/ even worth mentioning?

Actually I never use 4chan. It is broken under NoScript.

When I saw 8chan was back as 8kun I wandered back over after not using an imageboard since 8chan got shutdown. I grew bored and they didn't bring back /pol/, keeping /pnd/ instead. Which isn't a big deal, but it doesn't speak well of the admins. When the Randy genocide happened I lost intrest and started permantly using 16chan instead of just posting here and there. I found the link for 16chan on 8kun.

>>9714 >made in China 1-800-come-on-now.

Ive got an idea. Visit this wikihow article. https://www.wikihow.com/Tie-a-Noose Suspend it from the ceiling. Loop it around your neck. Jump off of a chair.

you could post in the general thread, too....

>>9713 This doesn't belong here faggot. Take it to b

Technically speaking the only thing that even has the potential to cure the virus right at the moment is the antibodies in my blood or in the other Responders... and we only make up 3% of the population. ...and even then it's not a 100% sure thing.

>>8080 Not all people are like this. But the ones who are...

>>8282 >qshit >makes no fucking sense It checks out.

>>9668 Most of that Q shit revolves around apophenic inferences, similar to "Bible Codes" or cold reading or astrology... your basic Texas sharpshooter style Barnum effects. Basically with any sufficiently large enough data set you can easily draw an infinite number of false conclusions, due largely to the curse of dimensionality. Most of the people who are easily tricked with such tactics are those often suffering from psychiatric disorders, some mild enough that they're still largely functional in society. Often times that mental deficiency is a result of ancillary medical problems as well, whether it's a vitamin B12 deficiency (found most often in Vegans) or thyroid issues or maybe they just ate too many lead paint chips as a child. Of course sometimes it's just natural stupidity. We're not all born equal and it can easily get worse with added upbringing and education (or lack thereof). If you take someone who is already low IQ and then flunk them along through public schooling (rather than putting them in a special education class)... yeah, it winds up breeding a very unique sort of stupidity... a very dangerous stupidity. I get the reason why they did it of course, I mean trying to educate trainables with special teachers and special classes just to get them marginally functional in society is an incredible cost burden, but shoveling those kids into regular classrooms under the banner of progressiveness and then later into "charter schools" was NOT an ideal solution. The really sticky issue as far as I'm concerned is with trolling. Trolling is a art of course, but if trolling is done by playing off mental psychosis rather than genuine gaffes, has it gone too far? Is Q breaking Formosa's Law?

>>9669 i thought you mentioned something along the lines of there being no universal morality in the past. in that case, nothing can go too far. even if the Q larper could reasonably verify himself and admit to his swindle, not all schizos subscribed to it would back down. my personal belief is that it is wrong to exploit retards. i hate lolcow harassment campaigns, but i'm not very fond of lolcows themselves either. i don't know a good solution without violating the crazies' rights and setting bad precedents

>>9671 I'm not really on any particular side of the fence, I tend to take a more nuanced approach to things. I also think that sometimes it's better to rethink yourself. For example, on the one hand you could say, "I'm not going to do it because I think it's unethical." But, for myself, I'm more inclined to say something like, "I'm not going to do it because there's no challenge, it's like shooting fish in a barrel." It's the SAME action, but the REASONING is different. That's why I try and avoid pure moralistic arguments because... they're lazy and often don't hold up well. It's like saying, "Don't do this thing because it's illegal." That sounds good in theory... except when you factor in people who do illegal shit on purpose, people who ~want~ to do illegal shit, or people who try and justify doing illegal shit. That's why, saying something isn't moral isn't really much better than saying something is illegal, neither makes a very good argument on the whole. It used to be a bit different in that the greater whole of society was more religious and, as such, you could use moralistic arguments, but that adherence was largely a product of FEAR rather than any genuine sense of logic or reasoning. The whole... "be moral or you risk going to hell"... morality through fear can be effective at curbing certain actions... but it's not a tactic that holds much weight in "current year" in the society in which we live.

There are other trolling philosophies that can be considered as well of course, for example The Portal of Evil had a very strict "non interference" Star Trek style. That is, they could document and mock a particular kook or lolcow from afar, but any level of active or direct engagement with the subject was prohibited UNLESS they came to the board and, even then, engagement wasn't to ever be pursued beyond the site. Which is somewhat similar to the "net abuser" concept during the 90s, when trolling was considered acceptable only when it remained online and anyone who deviated and went "RL" on someone was then branded as a "net abuser" rather than as a troll. And, at the time, being branded as a "net abuser" was like the ultimate badge of shame. Like being worse than scum. Worse than any kook/lolcow. These days though crossing the RL line is par for the course, it's typically expected and considered standard trolling behavior. There's also Mike Reed's perspective where... everyone is a troll... https://www.politicsforum.org/flame-warriors/

>>9607 What would you be worried about?

I had a massive wet dream all over my 10-yo kid sister's back... and she liked it!

>>9623 gtfo

>>9623 ...but you don't have any balls, so I don't see how this story could possibly be true.

>>9639 I am thankful that my 12-yo g/f is not pregnant yet.

>>9316 Thanks, I would probably enjoy 120 if it wasn't for the scat.

>>9329 It's better than what you post. I would rather the spammer at least he doesn't do this

>>9344 So then why are you here, Dumbfuck? I mean, I've been here for months and months, since nearly the original inception of this board... so why would you go out of your way to some completely rando, off the wall, largely unknown image board... with the person you apparently hate more than spam itself being the most prolific poster? Are you just incredibly fuckin retarded or is this like some sort of deranged masochistic thing? Like do you get off on stickin your own dick into a blender? I hate to break this to ya, Dumbfuck... but I ain't goin anywhere... and you ain't getting any less ass mad. Maybe it's time you rethink yourself there, Edith.

would fuck